← All tournaments

KOMPeK Economic Debating Competition 28

· AP

Sign in to mark goingTabbycat ›

The field

Unknown

Not enough data to assess field strength.

25 teams (This edition)

Motions

KOMPeK Economic Debating Competition 28 ()24 motionsCA: Rizky A., Vinay T.
  • Round 1TH Supports the rapid development of automation within governmental public services
  • Round 1in the interest of developing Micro-SMEs, This House Would significantly prioritize Micro-Enterprise Development Programs over Traditional Microloans
  • Round 1This House Would break up super-app companies
  • Round 2This House Regrets the Americanization of Sports
  • Round 2As a parent of an athletically gifted child, This House Would discourage their child from pursuing a career in professional sports
  • Round 2This House Supports the rising scrutiny placed on refereeing decisions within professional, competitive sports
  • Round 3This House Believes That the environmentalist movement in developing countries should significantly prioritize their advocacy on societal education regarding climate change, as opposed to structural governmental lobbying on green energy.
  • Round 3This House Opposes the emphasis of Boycotts as a strategy of protest
  • Round 3As the feminist movement, This House Would actively shame the act of pinkwashing
  • Round 4As the US Democratic Party, This House Would shift away from the use of identity politics in the 2028 Presidential Election
  • Round 4This House prefers the German method of post-war education to the Japanese method
  • Round 4THBT Indonesia should not push any support to the Trump-led Gaza Board of Peace.
  • Round 5This House Believes that contemporary children's authors should reflect the actual state of the world in their works.
  • Round 5With the benefit of hindsight, as Glinda, This House prefers a world without Elphaba.
  • Round 5This House Regrets the predominant portrayal of unhealthy relationship dynamics in mainstream films and media
  • QuarterfinalsThis House Supports the Indonesian government's decision to prioritize STEM scholarships.
  • QuarterfinalsThis House prefers a world where governments focus on sustainability goals on suburban development in comparison to urban development.
  • QuarterfinalsThis House Believes That it is not within the interests of developing countries to significantly push for free trade agreements
  • SemifinalsThis House Prefers a world with a complete belief in the Filial Piety
  • SemifinalsThis House regrets anthropocentrism in Abrahamic religions.
  • SemifinalsThis House regrets the glorification of letting go.
  • Grand FinalFor industries with high amounts of carbon emissions (including but not limited to Aviation, Energy, Manufacturing), This House Would ban the practice of Carbon Offsetting.
  • Grand FinalThis House Would incentivize the market establishment of electric vehicles in Indonesia
  • Grand FinalThis House Prefers a world where Artificial Intelligence was never introduced to mankind.

What gets set here

Technology8%
Economics4%
Sport4%
Environment4%
Social & Identity4%
Politics4%

Sign in to see how your strengths match this tournament’s topics.

Practice Technology motions ›Read: Generating arguments

You vs this tournament

What gets set here, next to how you have scored on each category across your own imported rounds.

  • Philosophy · 25% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Technology · 13% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Economics · 13% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Sport · 13% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Environment · 13% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Politics · 13% of motions hereno rounds on record yet

This week's plan

Built from what this tournament sets most. Import more tabs and this plan tunes itself to your weak spots.

0 of 8 done. Ticks save on this device.

Breaking here

32% of teams break

Teams usually guarantee their break on 4 points.

Break on speaks? Average at least 74.6.

Last edition: 8 of 25 teams broke.

~??% estimated break chance
??.?–??.? estimated speaker score

Sign in to see your personal estimates.

How scoring works here

73.4 avg speaker score

Most speakers land between 71.8 and 75.1.

What finishing high has taken:

Top speaker pace 77.0

Top-10 pace 75.6

Top-20 pace 74.2

Median average speaks at each finishing spot, across 1 edition.

Scout a CA

Search for a Chief Adjudicator to see what topics they tend to set and review past motions.

Type a CA name...

Prep with these too

Same kind of motions, same kind of field. Worth running through their past motion sets too.

Sign in to see the rest: scoring culture, who’s judging, similar tournaments, and your break chances.

Sign in to unlock