Fri 16 Jan 2026
From 1 tab, newest Irtiqa 2.0 2026.
How many points did it take?
4points were safe
in 2026
The last team in averaged 75.5 speaks in 2026.
What will they set?
- Philosophy33%
- Economics21%
- International Relations3 of 24
- Social & Identity3 of 24
Out of 24 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
How many teams, and how many break?
8of 35 teams broke
in 2026
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
Irtiqa 2.0 202624 motions
- Round 1This house believes that history education should prioritize the experiences of everyday people over the actions of great leaders.Practise this motion
- Round 1This House Supports Zero Percent Mandatory Attendance Policies in Higher Education.Practise this motion
- Round 1This House Would introduce outcome-based contracts for professors in publicly funded universities.Practise this motion
- Round 2This House Would nationalize the internet.Practise this motion
- Round 2This house opposes the "move fast, break things" philosophy in the tech sector.Practise this motion
- Round 2This house opposes the rise in transmedia.Practise this motion
- Round 3TH, as the environmental movement, would prioritise supporting green energy (e.g., solar, wind) companies over criticising fossil fuel companies (e.g., Shell, Saudi Aramco).Practise this motion
- Round 3This house believes that eco terrorism has done more harm than good for the environmental movement.Practise this motion
- Round 3This house supports green antitrust policies.Practise this motion
- Round 4THBT governments should design economic policy assuming citizens are financially irrational (ie. default enrollment in pension and saving schemes, opt-out rather than opt-in welfare programs,etc).Practise this motion
- Round 4THP slower but inclusive growth over rapid but uneven growth.Practise this motion
- Round 4This house supports the global shift towards homeland economics.Practise this motion
- Round 5This House Supports social movements' use of disruptive methods of protest.Practise this motion
- Round 5This House Believes That social movements should exclude allies who do not share the lived experience of the affected community.Practise this motion
- Round 5This house believes that choice feminism has done more harm than good for the feminist movement.Practise this motion
- QuarterfinalsThis house regrets the rise of identity politics in the 21st century.Practise this motion
- QuarterfinalsThis house supports the significant involvement of high profile individuals in politics (celebrities, billionaires, notable authors, Nobel prize winners).Practise this motion
- QuarterfinalsThis House believes that new democracies should embrace the politics of forgetting rather than the politics of confronting.Practise this motion
- SemifinalsThis house believes that states should prioritise bilateral trade deals over large-scale multilateral deals.Practise this motion
- SemifinalsThis house prefers a world with a strong SAARC.Practise this motion
- SemifinalsThis House Believes that that bilateral agreements are more effective than regional economic alliances for economic development.Practise this motion
- Grand FinalIn the aftermath of a nuclear apocalypse, This House would establish a new society based on the principles of the "Noble Lie."Practise this motion
- Grand FinalThis house prefers the half-empty over half-full philosophy in life.Practise this motion
- Grand FinalThis house supports the Ciceronian Philosophy of love.Practise this motion
How speakers score here
Speaker averages and what finishing high has taken.
- average speaker score, 1 edition
- 74.5
- where most speakers land
- 73.6 to 75.5
What finishing high has taken
- Top speaker76.5
- 10th speaker75.8
- 20th speaker75.3
Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.