← All tournaments
Symbiosis Law School Parliamentary Debate, 2026
Feb 27, 2026 · BP
Motions from this series
Symbiosis Law School Parliamentary Debate, 2026 (2026)10 motionsCA: 🇲🇾 Muhyuddin A., 🇮🇳 Vansh C., Minami M., Gaurangi P., Rushdoon A.
- Round 1THBT treating sobriety as a moral virtue is unjustified.
- Round 1TH, as a student union leader, W aggressively position themselves as anti-establishment
- Round 1TH, as the transgender rights movement, W actively decentre the physical body in constructions of identity.
- Round 1THBT the United States' increasing militarisation of the Gulf is in the interest of non-Iran Gulf States
- Round 1THS the decline of traditional Catholicism in Latin America
- Round 1THBT humanity should accept the deal.
- Round 1TH, as self-made affluent parents, W raise their children with middle class lifestyles (e.g living in modest housing, attending non-elite schools, liminting early access to family wealth, etc.,)
- Round 1TH, as a mid-tier football club, would refuse acquisition by a multi-club ownership group.
- Round 1THO the Reserve Bank of India's move to legalise leveraged buyouts.
- Round 1In states with high levels of incarceration, THW make federal funding for state prisons conditional upon achieving decarceration targets
Symbiosis Law School Parliamentary Debate, 2025 (2025)10 motions
- Round 1This house supports the establishment of a central authority within social movements.
- Round 2This house prefers a world where all sports are played in the GAA mode.
- Round 3This house regrets the prominence of left/liberal views at universities.
- Round 4This house believes that microcredit does more harm than good.
- Round 5This house would put a cap on financial and energy capital expenditure each company can allocate to the development of AI.
- Pre-SemifinalsThis house prefers a world where familial care labour is seen as a distinct service job rather than a personal/private responsibility.
- Novice SemifinalsThis house, as the World Bank, would aggressively fund models of conservation economics.
- SemifinalsThis house predicts that China will have the largest economy by GDP in 50 years time.
- Novice FinalThis house opposes the prominence of heroism as a value in society.
- Grand FinalThis house would choose to raise your children as strictly Hindus rather than raise them as strictly Muslims.
What gets set here
Social & Identity25%
Economics20%
Sport10%
Politics5%
International Relations5%
Law & Crime5%
Sign in to see how your strengths match this tournament’s topics.
Practice Social & Identity motions ›Read: Generating arguments ›Breaking here
20% of teams break
Teams usually guarantee their break on 11 points.
Break on speaks? Average at least 75.8.
Last edition: 12 of 55 teams broke.
- 202511 pts · 75.3 speaks12/65
- 202610 pts · 76.4 speaks12/55
~??% estimated break chance
??.?–??.? estimated speaker score
Sign in to see your personal estimates.
Break categories
This tournament runs a separate break for each category. From the most recent edition:
- Open break12 teams
- Novice break13 teams
Sign in to see the rest: scoring culture, who’s judging, similar tournaments, and your break chances.
Sign in to unlock