← All tournaments

Cambridge IV 2023

2023-06-01 · BP

Part of the Cambridge IV series →

Sign in to mark goingTabbycat ›

The field

Premier

One of the strongest fields in the circuit. Multiple nationally-ranked teams attend.

45 teams (This edition), 72 teams (2022)

Motions from this series

Cambridge IV 2023 (2023)8 motionsCA: Klaudia M., 🇵🇪 Mauricio C., 🇬🇧 Geneva R., Banun S.
  • Round 1THS people adopting an indifferent approach to news
  • Round 2THS the use of the Ludovico Treatment for violent prisoners
  • Round 3This House opposes the use of nostalgia* in political campaigning (*nostalgia refers to sentimental feeling of affection for a period of the past)
  • Round 4This House would continue to keep his identity a secret
  • Round 5THW break up banks* considered "Too Big to Fail" *Such as but NOT limited to Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and HSBC
  • SemifinalsThis House believes that it is in the best interest of Arab states to sever ties with the Israeli government
  • Grand FinalTHP a world where religions adopted the concept of "God's light"
  • ESL FinalsTHP a world where people do not strive to leave behind a legacy
Cambridge IV 2022 (2022)10 motionsCA: 🇭🇷 Tin P., 🇬🇧 Jason X., 🇷🇸 Marta V., 🇬🇧 Isabelle S., Harish N., 🇸🇬 Nar M.
  • Round 1THB the mainstream media should have covered the Hunter Biden emails
  • Round 2THS the antiwork movement
  • Round 3THBT Xi Jinping's consolidation of power is in the interest of the Chinese people
  • Round 4THBT the general approach of environmentally conscious large investors should be to sell their stakes in environmentally damaging companies rather than engage in shareholder activism
  • Round 5THS Elon Musk's purchase of Twitter
  • ESL SemifinalsTHB that international pro-democracy organisations should provide material support to feminist groups that aim to challenge non-democratic regimes (e.g. the Women's Organisation of Iran, Tehran Youth, Seminario de Estudios Sociólogics sobre la Mujer in Franco's Spain)
  • ESL FinalsTHP a world with rational egoism as the dominant outlook on life
  • QuarterfinalsTHBT majority liberal supreme courts should actively misinterpret constitutions in order to advance progressive rights
  • SemifinalsTHBT advanced economies should focus on rapid increases in growth, even at the expense of significantly higher rates of inequality
  • Grand FinalTH supports Iran’s extension of the Sharia principle of “an eye for an eye” to the victims of acid attacks

What gets set here

Media11%
Politics11%
Economics11%
International Relations11%
Social & Identity11%
Law & Crime11%

Sign in to see how your strengths match this tournament’s topics.

Practice Media motions ›Read: Generating arguments

You vs this tournament

What gets set here, next to how you have scored on each category across your own imported rounds.

  • Media · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Politics · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Economics · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • International Relations · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Social & Identity · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Law & Crime · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet

This week's plan

Built from what this tournament sets most. Import more tabs and this plan tunes itself to your weak spots.

0 of 7 done. Ticks save on this device.

Breaking here

20% of teams break

Teams usually guarantee their break on 11 points.

Break on speaks? Average at least 80.2.

Last edition: 8 of 45 teams broke.

  • 202211 pts · 80.2 speaks16/72
  • 202311 pts · 80.2 speaks8/45
~??% estimated break chance
??.?–??.? estimated speaker score

Sign in to see your personal estimates.

Break categories

This tournament runs a separate break for each category. From the most recent edition:

  • Open break8 teams
  • ESL break4 teams

How scoring works here

76.8 avg speaker score

Most speakers land between 73.5 and 80.2.

This is 0.5 points above tournaments of similar calibre.

What finishing high has taken:

Top speaker pace 83.6

Top-10 pace 81.6

Top-20 pace 80.4

Median average speaks at each finishing spot, across 2 editions.

Comparable: Meta Open 2026 (74.8), Warwick Pre-EUDC 2025 (76.6)

Top speeches

The highest individual speaker scores recorded at this tournament.

DebaterSpeechMotionScore
🇬🇧 William S.DLOTHW break up banks* considered "Too Big to Fail" *Such as but NOT limited to Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and HSBC85
🇭🇷 Tin P.PMTHS the use of the Ludovico Treatment for violent prisoners84
🇬🇧 Pranav B.DLOThis House would continue to keep his identity a secret84
🇲🇾 AhsanDPMTHS the use of the Ludovico Treatment for violent prisoners84
🇺🇸 Manuel M.MGTHS the use of the Ludovico Treatment for violent prisoners83
Jack S.GWTHW break up banks* considered "Too Big to Fail" *Such as but NOT limited to Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and HSBC83
🇬🇧 Bharath A.MGTHS the use of the Ludovico Treatment for violent prisoners83
🇲🇾 Kuhan K.PMTHS the use of the Ludovico Treatment for violent prisoners83
Jack S.DLOTHS the use of the Ludovico Treatment for violent prisoners83
🇬🇧 Mark R.GWThis House opposes the use of nostalgia* in political campaigning (*nostalgia refers to sentimental feeling of affection for a period of the past)83
🇬🇧 Mark R.DLOTHW break up banks* considered "Too Big to Fail" *Such as but NOT limited to Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase and HSBC83
🇷🇸 Ilija I.DPMThis House would continue to keep his identity a secret83

Scout a CA

Search for a Chief Adjudicator to see what topics they tend to set and review past motions.

Type a CA name...

Prep with these too

Same kind of motions, same kind of field. Worth running through their past motion sets too.

Sign in to see the rest: scoring culture, who’s judging, similar tournaments, and your break chances.

Sign in to unlock