Fri 15 Mar 2024
From 1 tab, newest Warwick Open 2024.
How many points did it take?
11points were safe
in 2024
The last team in averaged 79.4 speaks in 2024.
What will they set?
- Social & Identity2 of 8
- Politics1 of 8
- Technology1 of 8
- Economics1 of 8
Out of 8 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
Practise Social & Identity motionsLesson: Generating arguments
How many teams, and how many break?
8of 46 teams made the open break
in 2024
Field strength: Average in 2024, from the ratings of the debaters who went.
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
Warwick Open 20248 motions
- Round 1TH, as a state with an ageing population (Japan, France, Balkans...), would opt for policies that increase immigration (e.g. easing access to visas, financial incentives for companies employing immigrants, offering language courses) rather than ones that would increase natality (e.g. increasing parental leave, providing subsidies for childcare, tax breaks for parents)Practise this motion
- Round 2THW ban the development and release of SoraPractise this motion
- Round 3THO the glorification of youthPractise this motion
- Round 4THBT governments of developing nations with high national or sovereign debts should pursue haircuts as the dominant debt management strategyPractise this motion
- Round 5THO the collective suffering narrative in minority communitiesPractise this motion
- ESL FinalTHP a world where absurdism is the dominant belief systemPractise this motion
- SemifinalsTHW grant the ICJ independent jurisdiction to implement penalties against states that do not abide by rulings (e.g. fining states for non-compliance, expulsion from the ICJ, international recommendations of economic or military sanctions)Practise this motion
- Grand FinalTHW redistribute global sadnessPractise this motion
The break, year by year
The points that were safe, the last team in and how many broke, at each edition with results.
Every break in 2024
- Open break8 teams
- ESL break4 teams
How speakers score here
Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.
- average speaker score, 1 edition
- 76.3
- where most speakers land
- 74.3 to 78.4
- average at tournaments of similar strength
- 74.7
What finishing high has taken
- Top speaker83.0
- 10th speaker78.4
- 20th speaker77.2
Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.
Similar-strength tournaments
- Munich Open 202673.6
- Malaysia IV 202676.3
Top speeches
| Debater | Speech | Motion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 馃嚚馃嚘 Naomi P. | CGMG | THO the collective suffering narrative in minority communities | 87 |
| 馃嚚馃嚘 Naomi P. | COMO | THBT governments of developing nations with high national or sovereign debts should pursue haircuts as the dominant debt management strategy | 85 |
| 馃嚞馃嚙 Jacklin K. | CGGW | THO the glorification of youth | 84 |
| 馃嚞馃嚙 Kamila K. | CGMG | THO the glorification of youth | 84 |
| Arnav A. | OGPM | TH, as a state with an ageing population (Japan, France, Balkans...), would opt for policies that increase immigration (e.g. easing access to visas, financial incentives for companies employing immigrants, offering language courses) rather than ones that would increase natality (e.g. increasing parental leave, providing subsidies for childcare, tax breaks for parents) | 83 |
| 馃嚚馃嚘 Naomi P. | OGDPM | THW ban the development and release of Sora | 83 |
| 馃嚫馃嚞 Ha T. | OGDPM | THO the glorification of youth | 82 |
| 馃嚚馃嚘 Naomi P. | CGMG | THO the glorification of youth | 82 |
| 馃嚞馃嚙 Shaurya C. | CGMG | THO the collective suffering narrative in minority communities | 82 |
| 馃嚫馃嚞 Sharleen G. | OGPM | THO the glorification of youth | 82 |
| 馃嚞馃嚙 Shaurya C. | CGMG | THW ban the development and release of Sora | 82 |
| Vrinda K. | CGGW | THW ban the development and release of Sora | 82 |