IITK PD'26

2026 · BP

Below Average

A smaller or newer tournament. Good for building confidence and getting reps.

37 teams (This edition)

IITK PD'26 (2026)7 motionsCA: Robin A., 🇮🇳 Sehaj R., 🇺🇸 Lavanya P.

Round 1THW choose to represent China
Round 1THS an aggressive crackdown of the Mexico drugs cartels.
Round 1THBT the International Cricket Council should prioritize expansion into non-traditional markets (Italy, USA etc.)
Round 1THP a world where non romantic co-parenting is the dominant norm
Round 1As a means of enrolling people in the army, TH prefers conscription by lottery rather than the aggressive recruitment of volunteers.
Round 1As a means of enrolling people in the army, TH prefers conscription by lottery rather than the aggressive recruitment of volunteers.
Round 1THO the dominant narrative that acquiring forgiveness is essential in order for a flawed person to achieve redemption.

Abstract14%

What gets set here, next to how you have scored on each category across your own imported rounds.

Built from what this tournament sets most. Import more tabs and this plan tunes itself to your weak spots.

0 of 8 done. Ticks save on this device.

T-7Read the roomGo through this page once so nothing on the day surprises you.
T-6Work through "Generating arguments"Foundations for Social & Identity motions, the biggest slice of what gets set here.Open the lesson ›
T-6Work through "Weighing arguments"Foundations for Philosophy motions, the biggest slice of what gets set here.Open the lesson ›
T-5Prep sprint: one Social & Identity motion, 15 minutes, full caseMechanism, actors, weighing. Time it like the real thing.Pull a motion ›
T-4Case-prep past motions this tournament actually setStart with: THBT the International Cricket Council should prioritize expansion into non-traditional ma...Motion archive below ›
T-3One practice round with a partner or clubmateAsk for a Social & Identity motion and your weaker bench.
T-2Second sprint: PhilosophyPull a motion ›
T-1Light review and logisticsReread the numbers above, check the schedule, sleep. No new material the night before.

27% of teams break

Teams usually guarantee their break on 8 points.

Break on speaks? Average at least 76.0.

Last edition: 10 of 37 teams broke.

~??% estimated break chance

??.?–??.? estimated speaker score

This tournament runs a separate break for each category. From the most recent edition:

74.1 avg speaker score

Most speakers land between 72.4 and 75.8.

This is 0.0 points below tournaments of similar calibre.

What finishing high has taken:

Top speaker pace 77.3

Top-10 pace 75.8

Top-20 pace 75.3

Median average speaks at each finishing spot, across 1 edition.

Comparable: QMUL Open 2026 (72.9), Ottawa Classic (74.8)

The highest individual speaker scores recorded at this tournament.

Debater	Speech	Motion	Score
Sarvagya	MG	—	80
Arunima J.	OW	—	80
Antariksh B.	MG	—	79
Vinil S.	MG	—	79
Kriet V.	MG	—	78
Dharam	DLO	—	78
Guru	LO	—	78
Aarushi B.	OW	—	78
Ridhima V.	GW	—	78
Dharam	DPM	THW choose to represent China	78
Yashika S.	GW	—	78
Tejas	DLO	—	78

Search for a Chief Adjudicator to see what topics they tend to set and review past motions.

Type a CA name...