← All tournaments

McGill North American Universities Debating Championships 2021

2022-02-04 · BP

Part of the North American Universities Debating Championship (NAUDC) series →

Sign in to mark goingTabbycat ›

The field

Above Average

A competitive tournament. Good preparation ground for larger events.

80 teams (This edition)

Motions from this series

McGill NAUDC 2021 (2022)10 motionsCA: Yarn S., 🇺🇸 Gwen S., 🇺🇸 Sam H., 🇺🇸 Aditya D., 🇨🇦 Ruth S.
  • Round 1THBT the ubiquity of dating apps has done more harm than good.
  • Round 2THBT the South Korean government should break up chaebols.
  • Round 3THP a world in which humanity chooses voluntary human extinction over a world where humanity chooses continued existence.
  • Round 4TH, as the Catholic Church, would actively fund liberation theology in Latin America
  • Round 5THBT using loan conditions and defaults to achieve political goals is bad for the long term interest of China.
  • Round 6 (Closed)This house, as the progressive movement, would actively oppose political nihilism.
  • QuarterfinalsTHBT the Canadian government should stop prosecuting Indigenous peoples and allow the use of Indigenous law instead in all cases.
  • SemifinalsThis House would prefer a world where the response to the 2008 Financial Crisis focused on assigning responsibility and punishing individual instances of wrongdoing, instead of passing policies to reduce overall risk in the system moving forward (eg regulatory capital requirements, bans on proprietary trading, statutory underwriting standards for residential mortgages)
  • Grand FinalsTHP a world where all writing is pseudonymous
  • Novice FinalsTHP that billionaire-run charitable foundations engage in 'hits-based' giving rather than traditional charity work
NAUDC 2019 (2019)11 motions
  • Round 1THW punitively tax personal homeownership.
  • Round 2TH, given limited resources, W prioritize funding for early childhood care to the exclusion of funding of post-secondary education.
  • Round 3THR the narrative that ideal political debate should be objective to the exclusion of emotions and subjective experiences.
  • Round 4THBT ASEAN should adopt a common currency
  • Round 5THBT federal governments should suspend all funding to sub-national governments (states in the USA and Mexico, provinces in Canada) that violate religious liberties.
  • Round 6THBT parents should teach their children that they are inherently special (e.g., in what they deserve, and/or what they are capable of achieving).
  • Open QuarterfinalTH, as Russia, would announce that any further Israeli strikes in Syria will be met by a Russian attack on Israel.
  • Novice SemifinalTHS the use of truth and reconciliation commissions over courts in post-conflict nations.
  • Open SemifinalTHW allocate resources towards adapting to climate change, rather than mitigating/preventing climate change.
  • Novice Grand FinalTH prefers a polytheistic society to a monotheistic one.
  • Open Grand FinalTHBT it is morally legitimate to avoid taxes in undemocratic regimes.

What gets set here

Economics24%
Social & Identity19%
Law & Crime14%
Religion10%
International Relations10%
Politics10%

Sign in to see how your strengths match this tournament’s topics.

Practice Economics motions ›Read: Generating arguments

You vs this tournament

What gets set here, next to how you have scored on each category across your own imported rounds.

  • Economics · 24% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Social & Identity · 19% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Law & Crime · 14% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Religion · 10% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • International Relations · 10% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Politics · 10% of motions hereno rounds on record yet

This week's plan

Built from what this tournament sets most. Import more tabs and this plan tunes itself to your weak spots.

0 of 7 done. Ticks save on this device.

Breaking here

18% of teams break

Teams usually guarantee their break on 13 points.

Break on speaks? Average at least 79.1.

Last edition: 17 of 80 teams broke.

  • 201913 pts17/112
  • 202112 pts · 79.1 speaks17/80
~??% estimated break chance
??.?–??.? estimated speaker score

Sign in to see your personal estimates.

Break categories

This tournament runs a separate break for each category. From the most recent edition:

  • Open break17 teams
  • Novice break5 teams

How scoring works here

76.9 avg speaker score

Most speakers land between 74.4 and 79.4.

This is 0.9 points above tournaments of similar calibre.

What finishing high has taken:

Top speaker pace 82.2

Top-10 pace 80.2

Top-20 pace 79.3

Median average speaks at each finishing spot, across 1 edition.

Comparable: Meta Open 2026 (74.8), Warwick Pre-EUDC 2025 (76.6)

Top speeches

The highest individual speaker scores recorded at this tournament.

DebaterSpeechMotionScore
🇺🇸 Devesh K.GWThis house, as the progressive movement, would actively oppose political nihilism.86
🇺🇸 Brian L.MGThis house, as the progressive movement, would actively oppose political nihilism.85
🇬🇧 Matt C.LOTHBT using loan conditions and defaults to achieve political goals is bad for the long term interest of China.84
🇺🇸 Devesh K.DLOTHBT the South Korean government should break up chaebols.84
🇺🇸 Michael N.PMTHP a world in which humanity chooses voluntary human extinction over a world where humanity chooses continued existence.84
🇺🇸 Greg W.GWTHP a world in which humanity chooses voluntary human extinction over a world where humanity chooses continued existence.83
🇺🇸 Ye H.DPMTHP a world in which humanity chooses voluntary human extinction over a world where humanity chooses continued existence.83
🇬🇧 Max R.MGThis house, as the progressive movement, would actively oppose political nihilism.83
🇺🇸 Brian L.LOTHBT the South Korean government should break up chaebols.83
🇨🇦 Naomi P.DLOTHBT using loan conditions and defaults to achieve political goals is bad for the long term interest of China.83
🇺🇸 Greg W.DPMTHBT using loan conditions and defaults to achieve political goals is bad for the long term interest of China.83
🇺🇸 Benny N.DLOThis house, as the progressive movement, would actively oppose political nihilism.83

Scout a CA

Search for a Chief Adjudicator to see what topics they tend to set and review past motions.

Type a CA name...

Prep with these too

Same kind of motions, same kind of field. Worth running through their past motion sets too.

Sign in to see the rest: scoring culture, who’s judging, similar tournaments, and your break chances.

Sign in to unlock