Skip to content
Tournaments

Budapest Pre-EUDC Fundraiser 2025

What it took to break at this edition, what was set and who set it.

Sat 21 Jun 2025

From 1 tab, newest Budapest Pre-EUDC Fundraiser 2025.

How many points did it take?

10points were safe
in 2025

The last team in averaged 78.0 speaks in 2025.

What will they set?

Out of 8 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.

How many teams, and how many break?

8of 33 teams made the open break
in 2025

Field strength: Premier in 2025, from the ratings of the debaters who went.

Who has set the motions?

  • Maj H.
  • Oana N.
  • 馃嚘馃嚬 Victor B.

Chief adjudicators in 2025, the newest tab that lists them.

Past motions

1 edition with motions on record, newest first.

Budapest Pre-EUDC Fundraiser 20258 motions
  1. Round 1THP the use of gender mainstreaming in academia over having dedicated gender or feminist courses and academic institutesPractise this motion
  2. Round 2Assuming a minimum baseline of benefits provided, THP the Danish system of union benefitsPractise this motion
  3. Round 3In member states experiencing democratic backsliding, THBT the EU should actively adopt a partisan strategy (i.e. publicly supporting opposition parties, boycotting heads of state who disregard the rule of law, etc.)Practise this motion
  4. Round 4THBT social movements should adopt symbolic politics rather than traditional activismPractise this motion
  5. Round 5THP a world in which the pursuit of AGI is abandonedPractise this motion
  6. SemifinalsThis house believes that the LGBTQ+ community should actively combat the stereotype of queer hypersexualityPractise this motion
  7. Grand FinalThis house prefers a progressive epistemic approach over a conservative epistemic approachPractise this motion
  8. ESL FinalsThis house would require all people to regularly enter the switcherooPractise this motion

The break, year by year

The points that were safe, the last team in and how many broke, at each edition with results.

Every break in 2025

  • Open break8 teams
  • ESL break6 teams

Who sets the motions

Chief adjudicators by edition, where the tab lists them.

  • 2025Maj H., Oana N., 馃嚘馃嚬 Victor B.

How speakers score here

Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.

average speaker score, 1 edition
76.5
where most speakers land
74.4 to 78.6
average at tournaments of similar strength
76.3

What finishing high has taken

  • Top speaker80.4
  • 10th speaker78.6
  • 20th speaker77.0

Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.

Similar-strength tournaments

  • GME Pra-KDMI 202576.0
  • Doxbridge 3: Return of the King76.9

Top speeches

DebaterSpeechMotionScore
馃嚞馃嚙 Amy S.CGGWTHP a world in which the pursuit of AGI is abandoned84
Zoe M.CGMGTHP a world in which the pursuit of AGI is abandoned84
馃嚪馃嚫 Novak C.OODLOTHBT social movements should adopt symbolic politics rather than traditional activism84
馃嚭馃嚫 Rahul K.OODLOTHP a world in which the pursuit of AGI is abandoned83
George K.OGDPMTHP a world in which the pursuit of AGI is abandoned82
馃嚭馃嚫 Rahul K.CGMGIn member states experiencing democratic backsliding, THBT the EU should actively adopt a partisan strategy (i.e. publicly supporting opposition parties, boycotting heads of state who disregard the rule of law, etc.)82
馃嚞馃嚙 Alishba I.COOWTHP the use of gender mainstreaming in academia over having dedicated gender or feminist courses and academic institutes82
馃嚞馃嚙 Wurdaan K.CGMGTHBT social movements should adopt symbolic politics rather than traditional activism82
馃嚪馃嚫 Katarina L.OOLOTHBT social movements should adopt symbolic politics rather than traditional activism82
Esther K.OODLOAssuming a minimum baseline of benefits provided, THP the Danish system of union benefits81
馃嚞馃嚙 Aymaan S.OOLOAssuming a minimum baseline of benefits provided, THP the Danish system of union benefits81
Samuel S.COOWIn member states experiencing democratic backsliding, THBT the EU should actively adopt a partisan strategy (i.e. publicly supporting opposition parties, boycotting heads of state who disregard the rule of law, etc.)81