Skip to content
Tournaments

Call Out 2022

What it took to break at this edition, what was set and who set it.

Sat 26 Nov 2022

From 1 tab, newest Call Out 2022.

How many points did it take?

9points were safe
in 2022

The last team in averaged 79.7 speaks in 2022.

What will they set?

Out of 6 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.

How many teams, and how many break?

4of 35 teams made the open break
in 2022

Field strength: Ultra Premier in 2022, from the ratings of the debaters who went.

Past motions

1 edition with motions on record, newest first.

Call Out 20226 motions
  1. Round 1THBT states should follow the mantra: "Fuck the Arts Feed the Poor"Practise this motion
  2. Round 2THW keep the name 'the X Library' rather than rename itPractise this motion
  3. Round 3THBT the ends justify the meansPractise this motion
  4. Round 4THBT schools should teach about history as a product of clashes between social forces which represent different material conditions, rather than the product of clashes between different ideas and perspectivesPractise this motion
  5. Grand FinalTHS the establishment of a UN-led International Financial Institution for the regulation of global remittancesPractise this motion
  6. ESL FinalsTHP self-government with danger to servitude in tranquilityPractise this motion

The break, year by year

The points that were safe, the last team in and how many broke, at each edition with results.

Every break in 2022

  • Open break4 teams
  • ESL break6 teams

How speakers score here

Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.

average speaker score, 1 edition
78.1
where most speakers land
76.5 to 79.6
average at tournaments of similar strength
76.8

What finishing high has taken

  • Top speaker81.3
  • 10th speaker79.5
  • 20th speaker78.3

Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.

Similar-strength tournaments

  • Vienna Pre-EUDC 202677.2
  • Doxbridge 3: Return of the King76.9

Top speeches

DebaterSpeechMotionScore
馃嚞馃嚙 Umar B.CGGWTHBT schools should teach about history as a product of clashes between social forces which represent different material conditions, rather than the product of clashes between different ideas and perspectives86
馃嚙馃嚞 Biser A.COMOTHBT schools should teach about history as a product of clashes between social forces which represent different material conditions, rather than the product of clashes between different ideas and perspectives85
馃嚠馃嚤 鈥狾mer A.CGGWTHW keep the name 'the X Library' rather than rename it84
馃嚦馃嚞 Ayafa T.CGMGTHBT schools should teach about history as a product of clashes between social forces which represent different material conditions, rather than the product of clashes between different ideas and perspectives84
Muhammadbaqir A.OGPMTHBT schools should teach about history as a product of clashes between social forces which represent different material conditions, rather than the product of clashes between different ideas and perspectives84
馃嚘馃嚬 Paula B.COMOTHW keep the name 'the X Library' rather than rename it84
馃嚘馃嚬 Marina K.COOWTHW keep the name 'the X Library' rather than rename it84
馃嚙馃嚞 Maria M.COOWTHBT schools should teach about history as a product of clashes between social forces which represent different material conditions, rather than the product of clashes between different ideas and perspectives84
馃嚭馃嚫 Tejas S.COMOTHW keep the name 'the X Library' rather than rename it83
馃嚙馃嚞 Nikolay A.COOWTHW keep the name 'the X Library' rather than rename it83
Roi C.CGMGTHW keep the name 'the X Library' rather than rename it83
Furgurson A.OGDPMTHBT schools should teach about history as a product of clashes between social forces which represent different material conditions, rather than the product of clashes between different ideas and perspectives83