← All tournaments

Australian BPDC 2025

2025-10-04 · Australia, In person · BP

Part of the Australian British Parliamentary Debating Championship (ABPDC) series →

Sign in to mark goingTabbycat ›

The field

Above Average

A competitive tournament. Good preparation ground for larger events.

68 teams (This edition), 56 teams (2024), 54 teams (2023), 21 teams (2022)

Motions

Australian BPDC 2025 (2025)9 motions
  • Round 1This House supports the Albanese government’s social media age restrictions
  • Round 2This House believes that Australia should create a separate democratically-elected legislature with sole authority to create policy and determine spending on energy
  • Round 3This House prefers the narrative that you can never really know yourself, over the narrative that emphasises the need to "find yourself"
  • Round 4At the conclusion of the Russo-Ukrainian War, this House believes that it is in the interests of the EU to publicly guarantee and subsequently grant Ukraine EU membership within 5 years
  • Round 5This House prefers that Brazilian feminists oppose, rather than support, cosmetic surgery culture
  • Round 6This House believes that top academic journals should publish by selecting and formally reviewing drafts from preprint servers
  • QuarterfinalsThis House prefers water trading systems to riparian water rights systems
  • SemifinalsThis House believes that the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic should accept the Western Sahara Autonomy Proposal
  • Grand FinalThis House predicts that gender inequality in the West will worsen, rather than improve, in the next 10 years

What gets set here

Social & Identity33%
International Relations22%
Technology11%
Politics11%
Education11%
Economics11%

Sign in to see how your strengths match this tournament’s topics.

Practice Social & Identity motions ›Read: Generating arguments

You vs this tournament

What gets set here, next to how you have scored on each category across your own imported rounds.

  • Social & Identity · 33% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • International Relations · 22% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Technology · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Politics · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Education · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Economics · 11% of motions hereno rounds on record yet

This week's plan

Built from what this tournament sets most. Import more tabs and this plan tunes itself to your weak spots.

0 of 7 done. Ticks save on this device.

Breaking here

25% of teams break

Teams usually guarantee their break on 12 points.

Break on speaks? Average at least 79.9.

Last edition: 17 of 68 teams broke.

~??% estimated break chance
??.?–??.? estimated speaker score

Sign in to see your personal estimates.

How scoring works here

77.3 avg speaker score

Most speakers land between 74.7 and 79.8.

This is 1.6 points above tournaments of similar calibre.

What finishing high has taken:

Top speaker pace 82.7

Top-10 pace 80.5

Top-20 pace 80.0

Median average speaks at each finishing spot, across 1 edition.

Comparable: Meta Open 2026 (74.8), Vivaatam Pre-ABP 2026 (75.0)

Top speeches

The highest individual speaker scores recorded at this tournament.

DebaterSpeechMotionScore
🇦🇺 Elinor S.MGThis House believes that Australia should create a separate democratically-elected legislature with sole authority to create policy and determine spending on energy85
🇦🇺 Charlie R.DPMThis House prefers the narrative that you can never really know yourself, over the narrative that emphasises the need to "find yourself"84
🇦🇺 Sophie S.PMThis House believes that top academic journals should publish by selecting and formally reviewing drafts from preprint servers84
🇦🇺 Alexis M.DPMThis House believes that top academic journals should publish by selecting and formally reviewing drafts from preprint servers84
🇦🇺 Maya A.LOThis House prefers the narrative that you can never really know yourself, over the narrative that emphasises the need to "find yourself"84
🇦🇺 Elinor S.DLOThis House believes that top academic journals should publish by selecting and formally reviewing drafts from preprint servers84
🇦🇺 Elinor S.PMThis House prefers that Brazilian feminists oppose, rather than support, cosmetic surgery culture84
🇦🇺 Sophie S.LOThis House prefers that Brazilian feminists oppose, rather than support, cosmetic surgery culture84
🇦🇺 Charlie R.DLOThis House believes that Australia should create a separate democratically-elected legislature with sole authority to create policy and determine spending on energy83
🇦🇺 William M.MGAt the conclusion of the Russo-Ukrainian War, this House believes that it is in the interests of the EU to publicly guarantee and subsequently grant Ukraine EU membership within 5 years83
Angus M.GWAt the conclusion of the Russo-Ukrainian War, this House believes that it is in the interests of the EU to publicly guarantee and subsequently grant Ukraine EU membership within 5 years83
🇦🇺 Sam D.GWThis House supports the Albanese government’s social media age restrictions83

Scout a CA

Search for a Chief Adjudicator to see what topics they tend to set and review past motions.

Type a CA name...

Prep with these too

Same kind of motions, same kind of field. Worth running through their past motion sets too.

Sign in to see the rest: scoring culture, who’s judging, similar tournaments, and your break chances.

Sign in to unlock