Sat 7 Mar 2026
From 1 tab, newest Visayas ProAm 2026.
How many points did it take?
8points were safe
in 2026
The last team in averaged 76.4 speaks in 2026.
What will they set?
- Social & Identity3 of 8
- Politics1 of 8
- Health & Medicine1 of 8
- Economics1 of 8
Out of 8 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
Practise Social & Identity motionsLesson: Generating arguments
How many teams, and how many break?
18of 49 teams made the open break
in 2026
Field strength: Average in 2026, from the ratings of the debaters who went.
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
Visayas ProAm 20268 motions
- Round 1This house will prioritize statistical visibility over political visibility in making government decisionsPractise this motion
- Round 2This house, as the trans rights movement, would strategically emphasize biological rather than sociocultural explanations of transgender identity.Practise this motion
- Round 3This house prefers outcome-based payment models over fee-for-service models in healthcare.Practise this motion
- Round 4This house regrets the centrality of "pakikisama" in Filipino CulturePractise this motion
- QuarterfinalsIn economies dependent on primary-resource exports, this house will prioritize using a significant share of export revenues to develop manufacturing rather than reinvesting them in expanding the primary sector.Practise this motion
- SemifinalsThis house regrets the dominance of Rupaul’s Drag Race in drag discoursePractise this motion
- Novice FinalsThis house, as Christian religions, prefer emphasizing the apocalyptic dread of the Second Coming of Jesus Christ over its promise of hope.Practise this motion
- Grand FinalIn light of efforts toward “de-Dutertification,” This house belives that characterizing Duterte supporters as victims does more harm than good.Practise this motion
The break, year by year
The points that were safe, the last team in and how many broke, at each edition with results.
Every break in 2026
- Open break18 teams
- Novice break7 teams
How speakers score here
Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.
- average speaker score, 1 edition
- 75.9
- where most speakers land
- 74.8 to 77.0
- average at tournaments of similar strength
- 75.7
What finishing high has taken
- Top speaker79.5
- 10th speaker77.3
- 20th speaker76.3
Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.
Similar-strength tournaments
- Meta Open 202674.8
- Malaysia IV 202676.3
Top speeches
| Debater | Speech | Motion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇭 Lia T. | OODLO | This house, as the trans rights movement, would strategically emphasize biological rather than sociocultural explanations of transgender identity. | 81 |
| Alyssa D. | CGGW | This house, as the trans rights movement, would strategically emphasize biological rather than sociocultural explanations of transgender identity. | 81 |
| Gian M. | CGMG | This house, as the trans rights movement, would strategically emphasize biological rather than sociocultural explanations of transgender identity. | 80 |
| 🇵🇭 Lia T. | CGMG | This house regrets the centrality of "pakikisama" in Filipino Culture | 80 |
| 🇵🇭 Kyle B. | COMO | This house will prioritize statistical visibility over political visibility in making government decisions | 79 |
| 🇵🇭 Luigi A. | COMO | This house will prioritize statistical visibility over political visibility in making government decisions | 79 |
| 🇵🇭 Lia T. | OGDPM | This house prefers outcome-based payment models over fee-for-service models in healthcare. | 79 |
| 🇵🇭 Luigi A. | OGDPM | This house regrets the centrality of "pakikisama" in Filipino Culture | 79 |
| Patrice C. | OGDPM | This house will prioritize statistical visibility over political visibility in making government decisions | 79 |
| Ady B. | COOW | This house will prioritize statistical visibility over political visibility in making government decisions | 79 |
| Bridgette | CGMG | This house will prioritize statistical visibility over political visibility in making government decisions | 79 |
| 🇵🇭 Luigi A. | OODLO | This house prefers outcome-based payment models over fee-for-service models in healthcare. | 79 |