Fri 2 Jan 2026
From 1 tab, newest IVORIAN IV 2026.
What will they set?
- Social & Identity2 of 8
- Economics2 of 8
- Abstract1 of 8
- Religion1 of 8
Out of 8 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
Practise Social & Identity motionsLesson: Generating arguments
How many teams, and how many break?
18of 69 teams broke
in 2026
Field strength: Average in 2026, from the ratings of the debaters who went.
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
IVORIAN IV 20268 motions
- Round 1This House believes that spordom does more harm than good in modern society.Practise this motion
- Round 2This house believes that they should split up.Practise this motion
- Round 3This house believes that the concept of ‘enthusiastic consent’ is insufficient for feminist sexual ethics.Practise this motion
- Round 4This House Would implement substantial measures to impose long-termism in corporate investment culture (e.g., minimum holding periods, yearly reports, long term executive compensation plans).Practise this motion
- Round 5This house prefers a world where Karmic incarnation is more predominant than the afterlife narrative of a paradise and hell.Practise this motion
- QuarterfinalsAssuming revenue neutrality, This house would abolish major taxes ( Eg:- PAL,Income taxes,Corpotate Taxes) and replace it with increases in VAT.Practise this motion
- SemifinalsTHS Google maintaining the Google dark web report over focusing solely on Security and privacy management tools i.e password manager.Practise this motion
- Grand FinalTHBT regional organizations (e.g., ECOWAS and the AU) should be the main vehicles for security provision in Francophone Africa, rather than relying primarily on bilateral security partnerships with France.Practise this motion
How speakers score here
Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.
Top speeches
| Debater | Speech | Motion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luther | OGDPM | This house believes that they should split up. | 85 |
| Jeff | OGPM | This house believes that they should split up. | 83 |
| Eziel J. | CGGW | This House Would implement substantial measures to impose long-termism in corporate investment culture (e.g., minimum holding periods, yearly reports, long term executive compensation plans). | 82 |
| Henry F. | OODLO | This house believes that they should split up. | 82 |
| Speaker S. | OOLO | This house believes that they should split up. | 82 |
| Matenneh S. | OGDPM | This House Would implement substantial measures to impose long-termism in corporate investment culture (e.g., minimum holding periods, yearly reports, long term executive compensation plans). | 82 |
| Juanita A. | CGGW | This house believes that they should split up. | 82 |
| Bajeh M. | CGMG | This House Would implement substantial measures to impose long-termism in corporate investment culture (e.g., minimum holding periods, yearly reports, long term executive compensation plans). | 82 |
| Eziel J. | OOLO | This house believes that they should split up. | 82 |
| Speaker S. | COMO | This House Would implement substantial measures to impose long-termism in corporate investment culture (e.g., minimum holding periods, yearly reports, long term executive compensation plans). | 82 |
| Alia S. | CGGW | This House believes that spordom does more harm than good in modern society. | 81 |
| Richard K. | CGMG | This house believes that they should split up. | 81 |