Tournaments
TOA Pre-EAUDC Kampala 2026
What it took to break at this edition, what was set and who set it.
Fri 26 Jun 2026
From 1 tab, newest TOA Pre-EAUDC Kampala 2026.
How many points did it take?
9points were safe
in 2026
The last team in averaged 77.5 speaks in 2026.
What will they set?
- Technology2 of 5
- Education2 of 5
- Economics2 of 5
- Health & Medicine1 of 5
Out of 5 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
How many teams, and how many break?
17of 117 teams broke
in 2026
Field strength: Average in 2026, from the ratings of the debaters who went.
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
TOA Pre-EAUDC Kampala 20265 motions
- Round 1This house prefers a world where all high-stakes life decisions (e.g., career path, choice of spouse, medical treatment) are made by a perfectly objective AI, rather than by individuals.Practise this motion
- Round 2THW require all schools to allocate a significant amount of curriculum time to arts, even if this comes at the expense of STEM subjectsPractise this motion
- Round 3This house, as self-made affluent parents, W raise their child in lower SES(Social Economic Status) lifestyles (e.g living in modest housing, attending early non-elite schools, limited access to wealth and allowance etc.)Practise this motion
- Round 4THBT the narrative that "African youth will deliver the miracle that Africa deserves" does more harm than goodPractise this motion
- Round 5This House Opposes the rise of catastrophe marketsPractise this motion
How speakers score here
Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.
- average speaker score, 1 edition
- 76.7
- where most speakers land
- 73.9 to 79.5
- average at tournaments of similar strength
- 75.4
What finishing high has taken
- Top speaker80.4
- 10th speaker78.4
- 20th speaker77.4
Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.
Similar-strength tournaments
- Meta Open 202674.8
- Malaysia IV 202676.3
Top speeches
| Debater | Speech | Motion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ajok M. | OODLO | This house prefers a world where all high-stakes life decisions (e.g., career path, choice of spouse, medical treatment) are made by a perfectly objective AI, rather than by individuals. | 84 |
| Ajok M. | OODLO | This House Opposes the rise of catastrophe markets | 83 |
| Cynthia A. | COOW | THW require all schools to allocate a significant amount of curriculum time to arts, even if this comes at the expense of STEM subjects | 83 |
| Ree M. | COMO | THW require all schools to allocate a significant amount of curriculum time to arts, even if this comes at the expense of STEM subjects | 83 |
| Sam T. | COOW | This house prefers a world where all high-stakes life decisions (e.g., career path, choice of spouse, medical treatment) are made by a perfectly objective AI, rather than by individuals. | 83 |
| Nimurungi P. | COOW | This house, as self-made affluent parents, W raise their child in lower SES(Social Economic Status) lifestyles (e.g living in modest housing, attending early non-elite schools, limited access to wealth and allowance etc.) | 82 |
| Henry K. | COMO | This House Opposes the rise of catastrophe markets | 82 |
| Frederick A. | CGGW | THW require all schools to allocate a significant amount of curriculum time to arts, even if this comes at the expense of STEM subjects | 82 |
| Daniel O. | OGPM | This house prefers a world where all high-stakes life decisions (e.g., career path, choice of spouse, medical treatment) are made by a perfectly objective AI, rather than by individuals. | 82 |
| Itayi M. | CGGW | This house, as self-made affluent parents, W raise their child in lower SES(Social Economic Status) lifestyles (e.g living in modest housing, attending early non-elite schools, limited access to wealth and allowance etc.) | 82 |
| Nimurungi P. | COMO | This house, as self-made affluent parents, W raise their child in lower SES(Social Economic Status) lifestyles (e.g living in modest housing, attending early non-elite schools, limited access to wealth and allowance etc.) | 82 |
| Olindi F. | CGMG | This house, as self-made affluent parents, W raise their child in lower SES(Social Economic Status) lifestyles (e.g living in modest housing, attending early non-elite schools, limited access to wealth and allowance etc.) | 82 |