Tournaments
Filibuster Parliamentary Debate 2026
What it took to break at this edition, what was set and who set it.
Wed 8 Apr 2026
From 1 tab, newest Filibuster Parliamentary Debate 2026.
How many points did it take?
9points were safe
in 2026
The last team in averaged 75.6 speaks in 2026.
What will they set?
- Comedy & Novelty45%
- Economics2 of 11
- Law & Crime1 of 11
- International Relations1 of 11
Out of 11 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
Practise Comedy & Novelty motionsLesson: Generating arguments
How many teams, and how many break?
18of 58 teams broke
in 2026
Field strength: Below Average in 2026, from the ratings of the debaters who went.
Who has set the motions?
- Riddhi M.
- Mahesh R.
- Vani B.
Chief adjudicators in 2026, the newest tab that lists them.
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
Filibuster Parliamentary Debate 202611 motions
- Round 0This House would institutionalize the weekly sacrificePractise this motion
- Round 0This House would institutionalize the weekly sacrificePractise this motion
- Round 0This House would institutionalize the weekly sacrificePractise this motion
- Round 1THW prohibit the use of non-compete clausesPractise this motion
- Round 2THBT remittance dependency does more harm than good for South Asian countries.Practise this motion
- Round 3THW allow parents to give the Politeness Pill to their children under the age of 18, regardless of the children's consentPractise this motion
- Round 4THBT the LIO has done more harm than goodPractise this motion
- Round 5THS the aestheticisation of urban poverty in social media content.Practise this motion
- Quarter FinalTHP a system of universal automatic electoral registration to a system requiring active registration with proof of eligibilityPractise this motion
- Semifinals鈦燭HBT the US dollar's status as global reserve currency has become a net harm to the United StatesPractise this motion
- Grand FinalThis House would institutionalize the weekly sacrificePractise this motion
Who sets the motions
Chief adjudicators by edition, where the tab lists them.
- 2026Riddhi M., Mahesh R., Vani B.
How speakers score here
Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.
- average speaker score, 1 edition
- 74.6
- where most speakers land
- 72.9 to 76.2
- average at tournaments of similar strength
- 74.5
What finishing high has taken
- Top speaker78.0
- 10th speaker76.6
- 20th speaker76.0
Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.
Similar-strength tournaments
- Tilburg Open 202675.3
- Munich Open 202673.6
Top speeches
| Debater | Speech | Motion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raghav S. | OODLO | THS the aestheticisation of urban poverty in social media content. | 83 |
| Palak L. | OOLO | THS the aestheticisation of urban poverty in social media content. | 82 |
| Swing S. | OGPM | THS the aestheticisation of urban poverty in social media content. | 82 |
| 馃嚠馃嚦 Vedant S. | COMO | THS the aestheticisation of urban poverty in social media content. | 80 |
| Saathvik S. | CGGW | THS the aestheticisation of urban poverty in social media content. | 80 |
| Bismita B. | COMO | THS the aestheticisation of urban poverty in social media content. | 80 |
| Yash A. | CGMG | THBT remittance dependency does more harm than good for South Asian countries. | 80 |
| Poorvi K. | OGDPM | THBT remittance dependency does more harm than good for South Asian countries. | 80 |
| Hosmath S. | COOW | THW allow parents to give the Politeness Pill to their children under the age of 18, regardless of the children's consent | 80 |
| Mithun C. | CGGW | THBT remittance dependency does more harm than good for South Asian countries. | 80 |
| Aishwarya P. | CGGW | THBT the LIO has done more harm than good | 80 |
| Kushagra N. | COOW | THS the aestheticisation of urban poverty in social media content. | 80 |