Skip to content
Tournaments

Mini Spring Challenge 2026

What it took to break at this edition, what was set and who set it.

BPThe tab

Sat 14 Mar 2026

From 1 tab, newest Mini Spring Challenge 2026.

How many points did it take?

9points were safe
in 2026

The last team in averaged 79.5 speaks in 2026.

Every year

What will they set?

Out of 5 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.

Practise Law & Crime motionsLesson: Linear flow

How many teams, and how many break?

4of 25 teams broke
in 2026

Field strength: Average in 2026, from the ratings of the debaters who went.

Past motions

1 edition with motions on record, newest first.

Mini Spring Challenge 20265 motions
  1. Round 1THP the "career judge" approachPractise this motion
  2. Round 2THW force large media organisations to go public with the majority of their sharesPractise this motion
  3. Round 3TH as the EU would meddle in member states elections using non-violent means (active promotion, threats of budget cuts, offers of projects, influence operations, etc.) to weaken anti-EU parties or candidates (e.g. FIDESZ in Hungary, Duda in Poland).Practise this motion
  4. Round 4This House prefers that prominent businesswomen focus on providing women with tools to succeed in the industry (e.g., workshops, networking events, and mentorship) rather than advocating for systemic changes to the industry (e.g., changing workplace norms, shaming problematic organizations, raising awareness of gender-based barriers).Practise this motion
  5. Grand FinalTHBT the current Iran US war is in the interest of the CCPPractise this motion

How speakers score here

Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.

average speaker score, 1 edition
76.6
where most speakers land
74.2 to 79.0
average at tournaments of similar strength
75.7

What finishing high has taken

  • Top speaker81.3
  • 10th speaker78.8
  • 20th speaker77.3

Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.

Similar-strength tournaments

  • Meta Open 202674.8
  • Malaysia IV 202676.3

Top speeches

DebaterSpeechMotionScore
馃嚠馃嚤 Hadar G.OGPMTHW force large media organisations to go public with the majority of their shares84
Miriam K.OGPMTH as the EU would meddle in member states elections using non-violent means (active promotion, threats of budget cuts, offers of projects, influence operations, etc.) to weaken anti-EU parties or candidates (e.g. FIDESZ in Hungary, Duda in Poland).83
馃嚠馃嚤 Tamar M.OGDPMTHW force large media organisations to go public with the majority of their shares83
馃嚠馃嚤 Rina F.COMOThis House prefers that prominent businesswomen focus on providing women with tools to succeed in the industry (e.g., workshops, networking events, and mentorship) rather than advocating for systemic changes to the industry (e.g., changing workplace norms, shaming problematic organizations, raising awareness of gender-based barriers).83
馃嚭馃嚫 Amitai P.OOLOTH as the EU would meddle in member states elections using non-violent means (active promotion, threats of budget cuts, offers of projects, influence operations, etc.) to weaken anti-EU parties or candidates (e.g. FIDESZ in Hungary, Duda in Poland).83
馃嚞馃嚙 Lucie S.OODLOTH as the EU would meddle in member states elections using non-violent means (active promotion, threats of budget cuts, offers of projects, influence operations, etc.) to weaken anti-EU parties or candidates (e.g. FIDESZ in Hungary, Duda in Poland).83
Miriam K.CGGWTHP the "career judge" approach82
馃嚠馃嚤 Guy W.CGGWTH as the EU would meddle in member states elections using non-violent means (active promotion, threats of budget cuts, offers of projects, influence operations, etc.) to weaken anti-EU parties or candidates (e.g. FIDESZ in Hungary, Duda in Poland).82
馃嚠馃嚤 Tamar M.COOWTHP the "career judge" approach82
馃嚠馃嚤 Rina F.CGMGTHW force large media organisations to go public with the majority of their shares81
Hidden debater 路 56vqjOGPMTHP the "career judge" approach81
馃嚠馃嚤 Guy W.COOWTHP the "career judge" approach81