Thu 17 Dec 2020
From 1 tab, newest Melbourne Mini 2020.
How many points did it take?
11points were safe
in 2020
The last team in averaged 78.1 speaks in 2020.
What will they set?
- Social & Identity3 of 10
- Economics2 of 10
- International Relations2 of 10
- Politics1 of 10
Out of 10 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
Practise Social & Identity motionsLesson: Generating arguments
How many teams, and how many break?
9of 54 teams made the open break
in 2020
Field strength: Premier in 2020, from the ratings of the debaters who went.
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
Melbourne Mini 202010 motions
- Round 1This House regrets the decline in solidarity strikesPractise this motion
- Round 2This House believes that individuals should be encouraged to make significant sacrifices for their communityPractise this motion
- Round 3This House, as Iran, would accept the ‘Iran Deal Plus’.Practise this motion
- Round 4This House supports the democratisation of powerful civil service appointmentsPractise this motion
- Round 5Assuming feasibility, This House believes that the Holy Kaaba should be under the custody/guardianship of the OIC, instead of Saudi Arabia.Practise this motion
- Novice SemifinalsThis House believes that progressive activists in conservative societies should aggressively adopt conservative language/rhetoric in advocating for their agenda.Practise this motion
- Open SemifinalsThis House would mandate that social media users select middleware packages to curate the information they see on their social media accounts.Practise this motion
- Novice FinalsThis House would prefer a world the average person experienced substantially less intense emotions.Practise this motion
- Open Grand FinalThis House, as Moon Jae-In, would not have repatriated the North Korean defectorsPractise this motion
- ESL FinalsThis House supports the creation of 'ASEAN bonds' to fund the post-COVID-19 regional economic recoveryPractise this motion
The break, year by year
The points that were safe, the last team in and how many broke, at each edition with results.
Every break in 2020
- Open break9 teams
- ESL break4 teams
- Novice break12 teams
How speakers score here
Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.
- average speaker score, 1 edition
- 77.1
- where most speakers land
- 75.5 to 78.8
- average at tournaments of similar strength
- 76.2
What finishing high has taken
- Top speaker82.0
- 10th speaker79.0
- 20th speaker78.2
Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.
Similar-strength tournaments
- Meta Open 202674.8
- GME Pra-KDMI 202576.0
Top speeches
| Debater | Speech | Motion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇬 Nar M. | COMO | Assuming feasibility, This House believes that the Holy Kaaba should be under the custody/guardianship of the OIC, instead of Saudi Arabia. | 84 |
| Zachary C. | COMO | This House supports the democratisation of powerful civil service appointments | 84 |
| Zachary C. | CGMG | This House, as Iran, would accept the ‘Iran Deal Plus’. | 84 |
| 🇦🇺 Maison M. | CGGW | This House, as Iran, would accept the ‘Iran Deal Plus’. | 84 |
| 🇦🇺 Ben J. | CGGW | This House regrets the decline in solidarity strikes | 83 |
| 🇦🇺 Ben J. | OGDPM | Assuming feasibility, This House believes that the Holy Kaaba should be under the custody/guardianship of the OIC, instead of Saudi Arabia. | 83 |
| 🇺🇸 Zi H. | COOW | Assuming feasibility, This House believes that the Holy Kaaba should be under the custody/guardianship of the OIC, instead of Saudi Arabia. | 83 |
| 🇸🇬 Nar M. | OODLO | This House, as Iran, would accept the ‘Iran Deal Plus’. | 83 |
| 🇺🇸 Nicole K. | CGMG | Assuming feasibility, This House believes that the Holy Kaaba should be under the custody/guardianship of the OIC, instead of Saudi Arabia. | 82 |
| Zibusiso N. | OOLO | Assuming feasibility, This House believes that the Holy Kaaba should be under the custody/guardianship of the OIC, instead of Saudi Arabia. | 82 |
| Speaker S. | OGPM | This House, as Iran, would accept the ‘Iran Deal Plus’. | 82 |
| 🇺🇸 Nicole K. | OOLO | This House supports the democratisation of powerful civil service appointments | 82 |