Sat 2 Mar 2024
From 1 tab, newest Zagreb Open 2024.
How many points did it take?
11points were safe
in 2024
The last team in averaged 81.4 speaks in 2024.
What will they set?
- Politics2 of 8
- Arts & Culture1 of 8
- Economics1 of 8
- Education1 of 8
Out of 8 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
How many teams, and how many break?
8of 49 teams made the open break
in 2024
Field strength: Average in 2024, from the ratings of the debaters who went.
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
Zagreb Open 20248 motions
- Round 1THS de-banking as a strategy by governments in response to political extremismPractise this motion
- Round 2THR the academisation of artPractise this motion
- Round 3THS the Bank of Japan's decision to end its negative interest rates policyPractise this motion
- Round 4This house, as the parent, would send their children to be educated in a school whose means of communication is sign languagePractise this motion
- Round 5THP a democratic system with high partisan alignment, compared to one with low partisan alignment.Practise this motion
- SemifinalsTHW invade YemenPractise this motion
- Grand FinalTHO the belief that one's percieved status as oppressor or oppressed ought to play a role in determining the morality of their actionsPractise this motion
- Novice FinalTHR the rise of grimdark fiction in popular mediaPractise this motion
The break, year by year
The points that were safe, the last team in and how many broke, at each edition with results.
Every break in 2024
- Open break8 teams
- Novice break4 teams
How speakers score here
Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.
- average speaker score, 1 edition
- 76.8
- where most speakers land
- 74.1 to 79.6
- average at tournaments of similar strength
- 74.8
What finishing high has taken
- Top speaker83.0
- 10th speaker80.6
- 20th speaker79.2
Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.
Similar-strength tournaments
- Tilburg Open 202675.3
- Munich Open 202673.6
Top speeches
| Debater | Speech | Motion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 馃嚪馃嚫 Milos M. | OGPM | This house, as the parent, would send their children to be educated in a school whose means of communication is sign language | 86 |
| Aidan W. | OOLO | THS the Bank of Japan's decision to end its negative interest rates policy | 85 |
| 馃嚪馃嚧 Ana C. | COMO | THR the academisation of art | 85 |
| Aidan W. | OGPM | This house, as the parent, would send their children to be educated in a school whose means of communication is sign language | 85 |
| 馃嚪馃嚫 Ilija I. | COOW | THR the academisation of art | 85 |
| 馃嚪馃嚫 Ilija I. | OODLO | This house, as the parent, would send their children to be educated in a school whose means of communication is sign language | 85 |
| 馃嚟馃嚪 Tin P. | CGGW | THP a democratic system with high partisan alignment, compared to one with low partisan alignment. | 85 |
| 馃嚞馃嚙 Elena R. | OODLO | THS the Bank of Japan's decision to end its negative interest rates policy | 84 |
| 馃嚪馃嚧 Ana C. | OOLO | This house, as the parent, would send their children to be educated in a school whose means of communication is sign language | 84 |
| 馃嚟馃嚪 Tin P. | OGDPM | THR the academisation of art | 84 |
| 馃嚞馃嚙 Elena R. | OGDPM | This house, as the parent, would send their children to be educated in a school whose means of communication is sign language | 84 |
| 馃嚪馃嚫 Marta V. | OODLO | THP a democratic system with high partisan alignment, compared to one with low partisan alignment. | 84 |