2024
From 1 tab, newest Athens IV 2024.
How many points did it take?
10points were safe
in 2024
The last team in averaged 79.3 speaks in 2024.
What will they set?
- Social & Identity2 of 8
- Abstract1 of 8
- Media1 of 8
- International Relations1 of 8
Out of 8 past motions with a topic, from 1 edition.
Practise Social & Identity motionsLesson: Generating arguments
How many teams, and how many break?
8of 34 teams made the open break
in 2024
Field strength: Above Average in 2024, from the ratings of the debaters who went.
Past motions
1 edition with motions on record, newest first.
Athens IV 20248 motions
- Round 1This house would take the job if offeredPractise this motion
- Round 2THR the decline of consensus mediaPractise this motion
- Round 3THBT NATO should remove Turkey's MembershipPractise this motion
- Round 4This House Hopes for the widespread adoption of polygenic screening for mental health conditionsPractise this motion
- Round 5This House Prefers the primary funding source for SOEs to be state subsidies rather than loan agreements with private contractorsPractise this motion
- ESL FinalThis House Opposes the focus on complicity in humanitarian campaignsPractise this motion
- Semi FinalsThis House Opposes the focus on complicity in humanitarian campaignsPractise this motion
- Grand FinalThis House, as Hercules, Would stay in the human world.Practise this motion
The break, year by year
The points that were safe, the last team in and how many broke, at each edition with results.
Every break in 2024
- Open break8 teams
- ESL break4 teams
How speakers score here
Speaker averages, what finishing high has taken, and the top speeches at this edition.
- average speaker score, 1 edition
- 76.0
- where most speakers land
- 72.3 to 79.8
- average at tournaments of similar strength
- 75.7
What finishing high has taken
- Top speaker82.2
- 10th speaker80.2
- 20th speaker78.4
Median speaker average at each finishing spot, 1 edition.
Similar-strength tournaments
- Meta Open 202674.8
- Malaysia IV 202676.3
Top speeches
| Debater | Speech | Motion | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| 馃嚭馃嚫 Victor T. | CGMG | This House Prefers the primary funding source for SOEs to be state subsidies rather than loan agreements with private contractors | 84 |
| 馃嚞馃嚙 Nic R. | OOLO | This House Prefers the primary funding source for SOEs to be state subsidies rather than loan agreements with private contractors | 83 |
| Maurice C. | CGMG | THBT NATO should remove Turkey's Membership | 83 |
| 馃嚚馃嚘 Naomi P. | OODLO | This House Prefers the primary funding source for SOEs to be state subsidies rather than loan agreements with private contractors | 83 |
| 馃嚠馃嚤 Boaz K. | COOW | THBT NATO should remove Turkey's Membership | 83 |
| 馃嚚馃嚘 Naomi P. | CGMG | THR the decline of consensus media | 83 |
| 馃嚠馃嚤 Boaz K. | OOLO | This House Prefers the primary funding source for SOEs to be state subsidies rather than loan agreements with private contractors | 83 |
| 馃嚞馃嚙 Fraser M. | OGPM | This House Hopes for the widespread adoption of polygenic screening for mental health conditions | 83 |
| 馃嚚馃嚘 Naomi P. | COMO | THBT NATO should remove Turkey's Membership | 83 |
| 馃嚠馃嚤 Boaz K. | CGGW | THR the decline of consensus media | 82 |
| 馃嚙馃嚞 Niki A. | COOW | This house would take the job if offered | 82 |
| 馃嚠馃嚤 Hidden debater 路 1r7em | OGPM | This house would take the job if offered | 82 |