← All tournaments

Bristol Pro-Am 2024

2024-10-19 · England, In person · BP

Sign in to mark goingTabbycat ›

The field

Below Average

A smaller or newer tournament. Good for building confidence and getting reps.

33 teams (This edition), 54 teams (2023)

Motions from this series

Bristol Pro-Am 2024 (2024)14 motions
  • Round 0This House regrets the development of different fashion lines for men and women
  • Round 0This House would abolish the offside rule in soccer
  • Round 0This House would abolish all national days
  • Round 0This House believes that the passive voice should be banned
  • Round 0This House regrets the rise of emoji in everyday language
  • Round 0This House would enforce the Prime Directive
  • Round 1THBT the democratisation of AI has done more harm than good
  • Round 2This House supports the commercialization of the LGBTQ+ movement
  • Round 3TH opposes the trend of fantasy and sci-fi works the co-opting of Indigenous and minority languages, art, and culture for their worldbuilding (Avatar, Black Panther etc)
  • Round 4THBT development aid should primarily be targeted at individuals and communities over firms and companies
  • Round 5This House, as the European centre-right, regrets the Cordon Sanitaire
  • Bronze FinalThis House regrets the trend of grammar streaming in schools in the United Kingdom
  • Silver FinalTH Prefers a World with 'baby fever stoppin pills'
  • Grand FinalThis House, as the United States, would pursue actions aimed at destabilizing the Iranian regime (targeting supply chains, counterintelligence operations, increasing sanctions, diplomatic isolation, encouraging domestic unrest)
Bristol Pro-Am 2023 (2023)7 motions
  • Round 1THW provide student welfare as basic goods and services (eg: accommodation, food, textbooks) as opposed to cash bursaries
  • Round 2This House, as the UN, Would abolish permanent membership status
  • Round 3THBT that Argentina and Brazil should agree on a common currency union
  • Round 4THBT female political candidates in liberal democracies should not appeal to traditional female roles in their campaigns
  • Grand FinalTHW never enter into a relationship with a closeted individual
  • Silver FinalsTHW never enter into a relationship with a closeted individual
  • Bronze FinalsTHW never enter into a relationship with a closeted individual

What gets set here

Social & Identity24%
Economics14%
Politics14%
International Relations14%
Education10%
Technology5%

Sign in to see how your strengths match this tournament’s topics.

Practice Social & Identity motions ›Read: Generating arguments

You vs this tournament

What gets set here, next to how you have scored on each category across your own imported rounds.

  • Social & Identity · 29% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • International Relations · 19% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Philosophy · 14% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Economics · 14% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Politics · 14% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Education · 10% of motions hereno rounds on record yet

This week's plan

Built from what this tournament sets most. Import more tabs and this plan tunes itself to your weak spots.

0 of 7 done. Ticks save on this device.

Breaking here

29% of teams break

Teams usually guarantee their break on 9 points.

Break on speaks? Average at least 76.8.

Last edition: 12 of 33 teams broke.

  • 20238 pts · 76.7 speaks12/54
  • 20249 pts · 76.8 speaks12/33
~??% estimated break chance
??.?–??.? estimated speaker score

Sign in to see your personal estimates.

How scoring works here

74.9 avg speaker score

Most speakers land between 72.0 and 77.8.

This is 0.4 points above tournaments of similar calibre.

What finishing high has taken:

Top speaker pace 80.8

Top-10 pace 77.8

Top-20 pace 76.8

Median average speaks at each finishing spot, across 2 editions.

Comparable: Macau Debate Open 2026 (75.6), Tilburg Open 2026 (75.3)

Top speeches

The highest individual speaker scores recorded at this tournament.

DebaterSpeechMotionScore
🇬🇧 Lauren F.MOThis House supports the commercialization of the LGBTQ+ movement86
🇬🇧 Hamza N.MGTHBT the democratisation of AI has done more harm than good82
🇬🇧 Joshua L.LOTHBT the democratisation of AI has done more harm than good82
🇬🇧 Lauren F.DLOThis House, as the European centre-right, regrets the Cordon Sanitaire82
🇬🇧 Joshua L.MOTHBT development aid should primarily be targeted at individuals and communities over firms and companies82
🇬🇧 Alldon T.DPMThis House supports the commercialization of the LGBTQ+ movement82
🇬🇧 Michele L.DLOThis House supports the commercialization of the LGBTQ+ movement81
🇬🇧 Olivia A.OWTHBT development aid should primarily be targeted at individuals and communities over firms and companies81
🇬🇧 Joshua L.PMTH opposes the trend of fantasy and sci-fi works the co-opting of Indigenous and minority languages, art, and culture for their worldbuilding (Avatar, Black Panther etc)81
Liv M.GWThis House supports the commercialization of the LGBTQ+ movement81
🇬🇧 Olivia A.DLOTHBT the democratisation of AI has done more harm than good81
🇬🇧 Lauren F.MGTHBT development aid should primarily be targeted at individuals and communities over firms and companies81

Scout a CA

Search for a Chief Adjudicator to see what topics they tend to set and review past motions.

Type a CA name...

Prep with these too

Same kind of motions, same kind of field. Worth running through their past motion sets too.

Sign in to see the rest: scoring culture, who’s judging, similar tournaments, and your break chances.

Sign in to unlock