← All tournaments

Cambridge Intervarsity 2025

Nov 8, 2025 · United Kingdom · BP

Part of the Cambridge IV series →

Sign in to mark goingTabbycat ›

The field

Premier

One of the strongest fields in the circuit. Multiple nationally-ranked teams attend.

93 teams (This edition), 86 teams (2024), 45 teams (2023), 72 teams (2022)

Motions

Cambridge IV 2025 (2025)10 motions
  • Round 1THR the glorification of the 'authentic self'
  • Round 2THP societies in which charities and donations are prevalent over societies with a state-run welfare system
  • Round 3THBT the Democrats should fight dirty (e.g. rezoning electoral districts in their favour, frequent filibustering, initiating politicised investigations against opponents, etc.)
  • Round 4THBT European states should pursue a state-led innovation model
  • Round 5THP legal systems where prosecutors are appointed to legal systems where prosecutors are elected
  • QuarterfinalsTHBT Western governments should implement strict capital requirements on AI firms (e.g loan-to-value limits, selective monetary tightening, setting balance sheet stress tests, capital adequacy requirements)
  • SemifinalsTHO the belief that decisions should be made in a purely rational manner
  • Grand FinalTHBT Europe should prioritize the long-term containment of Russia, even at the expense of ending the war
  • ESL FinalsTHP religions where foundational religious figures are seen as morally flawed instead of morally perfect
  • Novice FinalsWhen funding academic work, THBT university departments should rely heavily on estimates of the work's expected impact in the world

What gets set here

Economics20%
Social & Identity10%
Politics10%
Law & Crime10%
Technology10%
Philosophy10%

Sign in to see how your strengths match this tournament’s topics.

Practice Economics motions ›Read: Generating arguments

You vs this tournament

What gets set here, next to how you have scored on each category across your own imported rounds.

  • Economics · 20% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Law & Crime · 20% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Technology · 20% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Philosophy · 20% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Social & Identity · 10% of motions hereno rounds on record yet
  • Politics · 10% of motions hereno rounds on record yet

This week's plan

Built from what this tournament sets most. Import more tabs and this plan tunes itself to your weak spots.

0 of 8 done. Ticks save on this device.

Breaking here

17% of teams break

Teams usually guarantee their break on 11 points.

Break on speaks? Average at least 79.6.

Last edition: 16 of 93 teams broke.

~??% estimated break chance
??.?–??.? estimated speaker score

Sign in to see your personal estimates.

Break categories

This tournament runs a separate break for each category. From the most recent edition:

  • Open break16 teams
  • ESL break11 teams
  • Novice break5 teams

How scoring works here

75.9 avg speaker score

Most speakers land between 72.7 and 79.2.

This is 0.7 points below tournaments of similar calibre.

What finishing high has taken:

Top speaker pace 82.6

Top-10 pace 81.2

Top-20 pace 80.2

Median average speaks at each finishing spot, across 1 edition.

Comparable: St Andrews Pre-EUDC Part 1 (77.2), Princeton IV 2025 (76.9)

Top speeches

The highest individual speaker scores recorded at this tournament.

DebaterSpeechMotionScore
Aidan W.MGTHBT European states should pursue a state-led innovation model86
Emma B.DPMTHBT the Democrats should fight dirty (e.g. rezoning electoral districts in their favour, frequent filibustering, initiating politicised investigations against opponents, etc.)85
🇬🇧 Tanush A.GWTHBT European states should pursue a state-led innovation model85
🇨🇦 Karel B.DLOTHBT the Democrats should fight dirty (e.g. rezoning electoral districts in their favour, frequent filibustering, initiating politicised investigations against opponents, etc.)85
🇨🇦 Anders W.LOTHBT the Democrats should fight dirty (e.g. rezoning electoral districts in their favour, frequent filibustering, initiating politicised investigations against opponents, etc.)84
🇬🇧 Leo M.LOTHP societies in which charities and donations are prevalent over societies with a state-run welfare system84
🇬🇧 Max P.DLOTHP societies in which charities and donations are prevalent over societies with a state-run welfare system84
🇧🇬 Maria M.DLOTHBT European states should pursue a state-led innovation model84
🇯🇵 Nasa T.OWTHR the glorification of the 'authentic self'83
Aidan W.PMTHR the glorification of the 'authentic self'83
🇯🇵 Kotaro Y.MOTHR the glorification of the 'authentic self'83
🇺🇸 Seamus A.PMTHBT the Democrats should fight dirty (e.g. rezoning electoral districts in their favour, frequent filibustering, initiating politicised investigations against opponents, etc.)83

Scout a CA

Search for a Chief Adjudicator to see what topics they tend to set and review past motions.

Type a CA name...

Prep with these too

Same kind of motions, same kind of field. Worth running through their past motion sets too.

Sign in to see the rest: scoring culture, who’s judging, similar tournaments, and your break chances.

Sign in to unlock